香港新浪網 MySinaBlog
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
港台工會 | 20th Feb 2008 | 立場 | (856 Reads)

工會強烈不滿政府降低招聘廣播處長門檻

質疑政府是否為屬意人選「度身訂造」,有失公平

 

The Union strongly dissatisfied with the lowering of barrier over the recruitment of the Director of Broadcasting

Doubts over whether this is a tailor-made package for a government-appointed candidate – unfair



  香港電台節目製作人員工會強烈不滿特區政府忽然降低招聘廣播處長門檻。工會不得不質疑政府是否在招聘廣播處長一事上,為屬意人選「度身訂造」,有失公平!

RTHK Programme Staff Union is vehemently dissatisfied with the government’s sudden move to lower the barrier on the recruitment of the Director of Broadcasting. The move forces the Union to question whether the government already has someone in mind for the post and that the change in recruitment requirement is aimed to make suitable for the person. This is unfair.

 

 我們重申,未來的廣播處長必須認同香港電台現時作為公營廣播的信念:編輯自主獨立,不偏不倚,為市民發聲,為市民提供高質素節目。事實上,這個角色亦是公眾所期望。我們不能接受未來的廣播處長與我們員工,以至市民大眾在理念和價值觀上南轅北轍。


  我們要求政府應及早向公眾交待是次做法的理據。


We want to reiterate that the future Director of Broadcasting will have to recognize the faith that has been supporting RTHK: editorial independence, balanced views, voices of the people and good quality programmes. In fact, this is also what the public has expected the station to perform. We cannot accept the fact that the future Director of Broadcasting will deviate from the general expectation and beliefs.

 

We demand the government to explain the rationale behind the latest move as soon as possible.

 


[3] 削足就履笑話一則

話說奇寶記者問白頭周:政府降低處長入職條件有乜睇法?
白頭周:唔講啦,有乜好講呀!
奇寶記者:講啦,政府降低條件,削足就履喎!
白頭周:唔係就我,邊係就我啫!
奇寶記者:周生,我唔係話就你。削足就履係句成語。
白頭周:...你想要soundbite係咪?聽住:最啱做處長係趙正春!(收線)

(道聽途說,確有其事)


[引用] | 作者 奇寶記者 | 26th Feb 2008 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2] 係咪公營廣播經驗先?

政府話有廣播經驗,未必有學歷,所以降低入職資格,咁係咪公營廣播經驗先?我稔港台中人如戴建文,喺呢方面點都豐富過街外人!如果係商營廣播經驗,跟本唔適合港台,特首同政府都叫過港台唔好做D商營電台既節目啦!


[引用] | 作者 日月山水 | 20th Feb 2008 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[1] Making the recruitment of Director of Broadcasting a truly OPEN one

The Government has made a strange move yesterday (20 Feb 2008) by lowering the entry requirements for the post of Director of Broadcasting and aroused controversy among the public. The move is so strange to a degree that when read more carefully, it actually has lowered the academic qualification to NIL as long as the candidates possess enough experience.

This move has led to a natural doubt that the Government has to alter the requirements to fit their already chosen “candidate”. It is double-misfortune as it has damaged not only the credibility of this open recruitment but also the legitimacy of the ultimate successful “candidate” to lead RTHK, whoever this person is.

To save the Government from such political suspicion and reassure the public that this is a genuine open recruitment instead of a political appointment, this second-round recruitment needs to be performed in a more transparent manner. The candidates this time should be put forward to the testing questions in front of the public as follows:

Do these candidates have:
1. a track record practising independent journalism?
2. a track record running a public service broadcasting organization or media of a similar sort?
3. an obvious pro or anti government stand/ image which might be seen as biased by the public?
4. an obvious pro or anti market stand/ image which might be seen as biased by the public?
5. an obvious pro or anti attitude towards any big political or civil groups which might be seen as biased by the public?
6. any close personal or business relationship with big institutional powers?

All of the above testing questions are for one purpose only: to ensure that the successful candidate has the experience and ability to withstand the pressure and resist interferences asserted by various political, economic and social powers in order to protect the public’s right to be informed as fully as possible, despite the fact that the recruitment process has begun with a suspicious move.


[引用] | 作者 Jace | 20th Feb 2008 | [舉報垃圾留言]